The media talks about Wikileaks but not this. Which is more important?

"This material is thermitic and shouldn't be there..."



9/11: Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out

The official story of 9/11 held al Qaeda responsible for the deadly attacks. Consequently, America has launched a perpetual war on terrorism and in doing so she invented a phantom enemy and even gave it a name that never existed before 9/11.

… One of the most perplexing sides of 9/11 is that the official story of who did it and how it was pulled doesn’t make sense to a lot of people who couldn’t buy into a story full of discrepancies and unanswered questions and couldn`t join the majority of people who found comfort in the simple official story and easily subscribed to the growing anti-Muslim discourse.

Many 9/11 conspiracy theories have been issued like the one which concluded that the Pentagon was hit by a missile- and not a plane- launched from inside the United States.

The strongest theory so far has been the one linked to the World Trade Center building #7- WTC7- that collapsed like a house of cards into its basement at free fall speed of 6.5 seconds.

But lately scientists and highly trained specialists have delved into the narrative of the weird collapse of WTC7 and they managed to scientifically refute the official and FEMA story and in doing so they somehow unleashed new insights into the 9/11 mystery and fortified the theory which claims that the WTC collapsed due to controlled demolition.

One of the first scientists who did research and analysis on samples of 9/11Ground Zero rubble was Neils Harrit, professor of chemistry at Copenhagen University.

According to a newly published scientific article, Neils Harrit and other eight researchers found Nano-Thermite explosive in the rubble of WTC collapsed buildings that couldn’t have come from the planes. They believe large amounts of explosives were placed in the buildings in advance, they concluded that it was Nano-Thermite that caused these buildings to collapse.

Link:
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2010/12/10/911-explosive-evidence-%E2%80%93-experts-speak-out/