Obama regime set to strip away another right
by Bob Livingston
Another salvo has been fired by the Obama regime against the Bill of Rights.
Not content to constrain its assault to the 2nd, 4th, 5th and 10th Amendments, the regime took dead aim at the 1st. Last Friday, Attorney General Loretta Lynch vowed to take “aggressive action” against anyone who used “anti-Muslim” rhetoric that “edges toward violence.”
Curious how no “aggressive action” is being considered against anyone using anti-white or anti-conservative rhetoric edging toward violence. It’s been available in spades for some time, but even more abundantly in the wake of the Colorado Planned Parenthood shooting and in the immediate aftermath of the San Bernardino massacre (at least before we learned of the Islam connection and while the progressives were still hoping it was “white conservative Christians” who shot up a Christmas party).
It’s also curious how Lynch didn’t promise “aggressive action” against Muslim bomb-makers. It would seem that, in the wake of a premeditated terror attack by a Muslim couple with ties to terrorists and a bomb factory in their home that Lynch would focus her efforts on finding whom Syed Farook and Tashfeen Malik were conspiring with to attack more Americans.
Lynch is delving into dangerous territory. What constitutes “aggressive action” and edging “toward violence” is highly subjective. It’s the type of speech the 1st Amendment is supposed to protect.
It’s also based on a false premise. There is no evidence of increased aggressiveness toward Muslims in the wake of the terror attack.
There is, however, a renewed effort by the regime to confiscate guns.