by Allen L Roland
Meanwhile, the worldwide 9/11 truth movement slowly rolls on and one of its most effective spokespersons has been Paul Warburton. Here is an excerpt from Warburton’s letter to the BBC written on July 7th, 2011 ~ “You can see how widely my correspondence is now spreading and how favorably it is welcomed in the 9/11 Truth movement. On board on the 9/11 Truth movement are some of the finest minds in the world and some of the most moral people in the world. (Doctors, Pilots, Scientists, Architects, Engineers, First Responders, some victims family members, some lawyers, some high ranking military staff, even some ex intelligence staff and thousands of gutsy activists (our true heroes, many unknown and who work very hard, who go onto the streets around the world every week to spread the truth – all of them committed to the pursuit of truth over the most pivotal event of the 21st Century – 9/11). Pursuing this goal puts some of them in physical danger. We have already lost some dear people in suspicious circumstances. The two notable exceptions to the 9/11Truth movement are the mainstream church and media in both the UK and the USA. The two great societal bodies that people look to for truth. Their silence on such a major issue of injustice has been deafening. I suggest it has little to do with a lack of intelligence. It has a lot to do with courage or the lack of it.”
Warburton than makes his point ~ Crystallizing this down to a few basic principles of criminal and investigative journalism you at the BBC have failed as a fact to ask these basic questions about 9/11;
Where is the film footage of the Boeing striking the Pentagon?
Why haven’t your journalists asked the US authorities to see it? Why is it secret?
Why haven’t you interviewed people like April Gallop who stepped through that Pentagon hole after the attack and said there was no plane there?
Why haven’t you interviewed firefighters who heard explosions in the Twin Towers?
Why havent you been able to show substantial wreckage (or photos of) from the Shanksville site?
Why do you only interview explosives experts that back the official version ?
Why don’t you speak to any pilots from pilots for 9/11truth ?
Why don’t you speak to victim’s family members who still demand an independent investigation?
Why are 5 of the alleged hijackers alive and well according to your own news reporting ? Who then did hijack the planes?
Why aren’t you seeking written scientific evidence to rebut the compelling Thermite explosion claims of the teams of Richard Gage and Niels Harrit?
Why are your programs “conspiracy files” on 9/11 so overtly biased as to not withstand scrutiny as fair and objective ~ and why don’t they address any of the above issues ?
Warburton ends with this statement ~ “Each above fact is suggestive in itself but taken as a cumulative the argument is overwhelming and would pass the criminal standard of proof beyond reasonable doubt ~ in that the Official 9/11 report is radically wrong.”
So now, after ten years, millions of people throughout the world are still asking questions and not getting answers about the validity of the official report ~ which is not only radically wrong but purposely misleading .
But here are some facts to ponder on the 10th anniversary of 9/11 ~
The 9/11 Commission’s co-chairs said that the 9/11 Commissioners knew that military officials misrepresented the facts to the Commission, and the Commission considered recommending criminal charges for such false statements
9/11 Commission co-chair Lee Hamilton said “I don’t believe for a minute we got everything right”, that the Commission was set up to fail, that people should keep asking questions about 9/11, and that the 9/11 debate should continue ”
9/11 Commissioner Timothy Roemer said “We were extremely frustrated with the false statements we were getting”
9/11 Commissioner Max Cleland resigned from the Commission, stating: “It is a national scandal”; “This investigation is now compromised”; and “One of these days we will have to get the full story because the 9-11 issue is so important to America. But this White House wants to cover it up”
9/11 Commissioner Bob Kerrey said that “There are ample reasons to suspect that there may be some alternative to what we outlined in our version . . . We didn’t have access . . . .” He also said that the investigation depended too heavily on the accounts of Al Qaeda detainees who were physically coerced into talking.
And the Senior Counsel to the 9/11 Commission (John Farmer) – who led the 9/11 staff’s inquiry – said “At some level of the government, at some point in time…there was an agreement not to tell the truth about what happened“. He also said “I was shocked at how different the truth was from the way it was described …. The tapes told a radically different story from what had been told to us and the public for two years…. This is not spin. This is not true.” And he said: “It’s almost a culture of concealment, for lack of a better word. There were interviews made at the FAA’s New York center the night of 9/11 and those tapes were destroyed. The CIA tapes of the interrogations were destroyed. The story of 9/11 itself, to put it mildly, was distorted and was completely different from the way things happened”
If even the 9/11 Commissioners don’t buy the official story, why do you?
Read the whole article:
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/07/11/eleven-911-questions-which-still-demand-answers/
No comments:
Post a Comment