Once the media tells us who carried out the Boston marathon bombing, how can we believe them?
Mike Adams
At some point here in the next few days, the mainstream media is going to announce the culprit behind yesterday's bombings at the Boston marathon race. The question, though, is how can we believe them?
When it comes to reporting the truth about acts of terrorism, the media has zero credibility. For starters, the entire mainstream media still won't report anything about WTC building 7. This is a concrete and steel structure that the government says collapsed on 9/11, in perfect demolition style, because of a few fires burning inside the building.
There's only one problem with that: Concrete doesn't burn or melt. In the entire history of architecture, concrete-and-steel buildings have never -- NEVER! -- collapsed from fires.
There's also the fact that the BBC reported the collapse of building 7 a full 20 minutes before it actually fell.
Oops. Somebody got their time zones mixed up and reported something as a "fact" before it actually happened. Logically, this means they must have had prior knowledge of the collapse.
The official story on Oklahoma City is also a hoax
Rewind a few years, back to Oklahoma City, and you also get a complete media hoax about the bombing there, too. The official story that Timothy McVeigh drove up in a rental truck filled with fertilizer and then managed to blast away the entire front half of the building doesn't compute. It actually violates the laws of physics.
To create a blast effect like what was shown in the media, you'd have to drill blast holes into the building pillars and place explosives there.
Click here to watch the trailer of A Noble Lie, a documentary that absolutely shreds the official story we've all been sold in the media.
Drone strikes are a type of terrorism
And then we have the fact that the media selectively ignores other acts of terrorism, such as the drone strikes unleashed by the U.S. government onto civilian targets in the Middle East. As U.S. Defense Secretary said yesterday, "any event with explosive devices is clearly an act of terror."
But what he really means is that "any event with explosive devices NOT carried out by the United States is clearly an act of terror." Because in his mind, when the U.S. military carries out drone strikes, they don't count.
Obama also joins in the hypocrisy, saying, "Any time bombs are used to target civilians it is an act of terror." But again, what he means any time except when the U.S. military uses bombs to target civilians.
Here's a list of hundreds of drone strikes carried out by the USA just in Pakistan. There are countless more drone strikes in other nations.
Many of these drone strikes kill 20 or 30 people at a time, making them far more deadly than the Boston marathon bombing. You don't hear anything in the U.S. press about these "explosive devices" being called "acts of terror," however. The carnage caused by drone strikes is completely glossed over by the leftist media, which has become, under Obama, the "pro-war" media.
The media is already desperately hoping the culprits are "right-wing extremists"
On top of all that, the leftist media is openly implying that the Boston marathon bombings were carried out by "right-wing extremists." Without a shred of evidence, this has become one of the talking points in mainstream media coverage.
There's never any talk of "left-wing extremists" carrying out such bombings, apparently because the left can never do anything wrong.
Except, of course, in the case of abortion murderer Kermit Gosnell, who murdered hundreds of babies born alive by severing their spinal columns with scissors. The mainstream media absolutely refuses to cover this story, primarily because the leftist media is "pro abortion" and doesn't want to make abortionists look like murderers (even the ones that clearly are).
An online petition has been launched to call for fair media coverage of this national story with huge social implications.
The media has already decided who's guilty
The bottom line in all this is that the mainstream media has already decided who's guilty for everything bad that happens in America. It's right-wingers... gun owners... white people... patriots... veterans... conservatives.
Don't you know it's the fault of all gun owners that 20 children were killed at the Sandy Hook elementary school? How could it not be?
Sure, there's no logic to it, but the leftist media doesn't operate from logic. It simply picks a group to vilify and goes on the attack. Somehow, they will find a way to blame patriots for the bombings, even if it means fabricating evidence and ignoring reality.
If, for some reason, they can't blame patriots because overwhelming evidence points to a foreign terror cell, they will still exploit the tragedy to call for DHS agents on the streets of America, with police state security at every sporting event from here forward.
When it comes to the rise of tyranny, the left is blind. They literally can't see it unfolding right before their eyes. In their minds, there's never enough "security" and there are always too many "rights" in America. Their utopia is an Orwellian 1984 military police state where everyone is kept safe because the entire country is transformed into a "Constitution-free zone" where TSA agents reach down your pants and no citizens are allowed to own weapons of any kind.
That's where all this is headed, by the way. So beware of "calls for action" in the aftermath of this bombing. Just about every "action" will be an assault on American liberties and freedoms.
Besides, the best way to stop the bombings is to stop pissing people off everywhere around the world. When we engage in hundreds of drone strikes on civilian populations all across the Middle East, do we really think they won't find a way to retaliate?
It could be said, in fact, that the Boston marathon bombing might have been a "poor man's retaliatory drone strike" on America.
Link:
http://www.naturalnews.com/039944_Boston_marathon_bombing_mainstream_media.html
No comments:
Post a Comment